EmpIzza
-
452 votesEmpIzza
gave this 1 vote
·
-
2,647 votesEmpIzza
commented
·
Well, I'm about to run out of votes since there are alot of things which could be improved, but if it was released under GPL I could just fix em myself, now thats a thought!
I agree fully with Matthias, even if it isn't released under GPL, please just release the BibTeX export module under GPL so we can fix it!
Please :)
EmpIzza
gave this 3 votes
·
-
22 votesEmpIzza
commented
·
@pol, actually that idea is a heck of a lot more precise than this, any open source licence is better than prop, but is doesn't have to be GPL. Prolly GPL would help Mendeley get into the repositories of all the linux distros, but as stated, any open source licence is better than prop-software.
EmpIzza
gave this 3 votes
·
-
166 votescompleted ·
AdminNicolas Esteves
(Admin, Mendeley)
responded
Hi,
Sorry about the delay, but the issue if finally fixed and will be out in version 1.5 which should be out in few weeks. (and 1.5 dev preview 2 that should be out in the next few days).
Thanks again for your patience
EmpIzza
commented
·
Works for me.. (finally duh..)
Why don't you release mendeley as open source?
EmpIzza
commented
·
@Dan: If you are using *nix, latex and makefiles its quite easy to use sed (or other stream editor) to modify the .bib before build.
EmpIzza
commented
·
This is quite a letdown actually, how come users cannot modify which entries of the entrytypes are exported to bibtex?
This actually makes the tech savvy of us not recommend mendeley..
EmpIzza
gave this 3 votes
·
This would be a fantastic idea :D
I'm currently doing my PhD and keeping track of articles soon seems to be more of an effort than actually going through them :P